Cite as: De Clerck, O., K. Bogaert, and F. Leliaert. 2012. Diversity and evolution of algae: primary endosymbiosis. Advances in Botanical Research 64:55-86. pdf
Abstract: Oxygenic photosynthesis, the chemical process whereby light energy powers the conversion of carbon dioxide into organic compounds and oxygen is released as a waste product, evolved in the anoxygenic ancestors of Cyanobacteria. Although there is still uncertainty about when precisely and how this came about, the gradual oxygenation of the Proterozoic oceans and atmosphere opened the path for aerobic organisms and ultimately eukaryotic cells to evolve. There is a general consensus that photosynthesis was acquired by eukaryotes through endosymbiosis, resulting in the enslavement of a cyanobacterium to become a plastid. Here we give an update of the current understanding of the primary endosymbiotic event that gave rise to the Archaeplastida. In addition we provide an overview of the diversity in the Rhodophyta, Glaucophyta and the Viridiplantae (excluding the Embryophyta) and highlight how genomic data is enabling us to understand the relationships and characteristics of algae emerging from this primary endosymbiotic event.
A. Early evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis
The origin of oxygenic photosynthesis has changed the face of our planet in all aspects. The first organisms that developed oxygenic photosynthesis are thought to have been the anoxygenic ancestors of Cyanobacteria (Allen & Martin, 2007), but when and how this came about remains a matter of debate (Farquhar, Zerkle & Bekker, 2011; Hohmann-Marriott & Blankenship, 2011). Estimates based on geological and geochemical evidence, and molecular phylogenetic analyses calibrated with the fossil record agree on a minimum age of 2.3 billion years ago (Tomitani et al., 2006), but the origin of oxygenic photosynthesis may date back to 3.4 or even 3.8 billion years ago (Buick, 2008; Russell & Hall, 2006) (Fig. 1E). Because oxygenic photosynthesis involves the photolysis of water into electrons, protons, and free oxygen, Cyanobacteria are singularly responsible for oxygenating the atmosphere and transforming a once reducing environment into an oxidising one (Holland, 2006).
With oxygen becoming gradually available as a very potent electron acceptor, the path lay open for aerobic organisms to evolve. Aerobes soon managed to maintain much more productive ecosystems as more energy per electron transfer could be harvested. Consequently oceanic primary production increased an order of magnitude (Canfield, Rosing & Bjerrum, 2006), permitting the evolution of more complex life forms (Catling et al., 2005) and adapted or novel biochemical pathways (Falkowski, 2006; Raymond & Segré, 2006). The rising atmospheric oxygen is thought to have directly triggered cellular compartmentalization and eukaryogenesis (Fig 1E). Atmospheric oxygen is thought to have constrained the topology of ancient transmembrane proteins by limiting the size and number of the external domains of transmembrane proteins (Acquisti, Kleffe & Collins, 2007). When oxygen levels rose the constraint likely decreased permitting larger and more communication-related transmembrane proteins opening the door for subsequent compartmentalization. Alternatively, rising oxygen levels is speculated to have promoted cellular compartmentalization in order to protect the metabolic activities of the plasma membrane from rising levels of reactive oxygen species in the cellular environment (Gross & Bhattacharya, 2010). The fossil record (Knoll et al., 2006; Javaux, 2011) and time-calibrated phylogenies (Hedges et al., 2004; Parfrey et al., 2011) suggest that the major eukaryotic lineages diverged already in the Paleoproterozoic era (2500–1600 Ma), but that diversity within major extant clades expanded later, beginning about 800 Ma, coinciding with the spread of oxygen through the Neoproterozoic oceans (Fig 1A, E).
B. Origin of plastids: primary endosymbiosis
Even though there is still considerable debate regarding the precise mechanisms and sequence of events that resulted in the first eukaryotic cell (de Duve, 2007; Embley & Martin, 2006; Martin & Muller, 1998; Poole & Neumann, 2011; Roger, 1999), there is a general consensus that photosynthetic eukaryotes emerged from a heterotrophic eukaryote which engulfed a cyanobacterium. The cyanobacterium was gradually enslaved and integrated into the cellular machinery as a new organelle: the plastid. This event has been termed primary endosymbiosis. The cyanobacterial origin of plastids is supported by overwhelming genetic evidence and ultrastructural similarities between plastids and their cyanobacterial relatives (Box 1). The original cyanobacterial genome underwent a drastic reduction with most genes either lost or transferred to the host nucleus, termed endosymbiotic gene transfer (EGT). A fraction of the genome is retained within the primary plastid, minimally encoding its own protein synthesizing machinery and a number of genes involved in photosynthesis (Gould, Waller & McFadden, 2008). Genes that have been transferred to the host nucleus are transcribed and translated in the host cytosol or endoplasmic reticulum and are targeted back to the chloroplast using a protein import system (Bhattacharya et al., 2007). In contrast to what might be intuitively expected, also gene products of host origin can be plastid-targeted and only a subset of cyanobacterial genes takes up a function in the organelle (Deusch et al., 2008; Martin et al., 2002). The overall emerging picture is one of large genomic impact of the symbiont on its host after primary endosymbiosis (Elias & Archibald, 2009), although the exact impact on the genomic content of Archaeplastida remains uncertain. Some phylogenomic analyses estimate the contributed genes to range around 20 % of the total gene number when including a correction for the high rate of divergence (Deusch et al., 2008; Martin et al., 2002). Others calculate more modest percentages of chloroplast-derived genes, ranging around 5 % while acknowledging these proportions are most likely underestimations due to high sequence divergence (Moustafa & Bhattacharya, 2008; Reyes-Prieto et al., 2006). Next to sequence divergence, amelioration and modularity of transferred genes are thought to be additional complicating factors to detect horizontal gene transfer (Chan et al., 2011). Remarkably, some phylogenomic analyses, with the exception of the glaucophyte study of Reyes-Prieto et al. (2006) indicate that more than 50% of the transferred genes have other functions, from metabolism to cell division, instead of being plastid-targeted (Deusch et al. 2008; Martin et al. 2002).
|Box 1. Ultrastructural and molecular similarities between plastids and Cyanobacteria|
|Homology between (envelope) membranes||Presence of galactolipids, b-barrel proteins and occurrence of a peptidoglycan layer in Glaucophyta|
|Chloroplast DNA||Similarities in structure and gene content of the circular genome, organized into discrete nucleoids|
|Molecular phylogeny||Phylogenetic studies indicate chloroplast gene sequences are nested within eubacterial homologs|
|Nuclear genes of cyanobacterial origin||Ample presence of genes of presumed cyanobacterial origin in the nuclear genome as a consequence of endosymbiotic gene transfer (EGT)|
|Ribosomes||Chloroplasts contain ribosomes that are 70S in size, similar to prokaryotic ribosomes, as opposed to typical eukaryotic, cytosolic and ER-associated ribosomes which are 80S in size; Inhibition by antibiotics (e.g. streptomycin, kanamycin) that affect ribosome function in free-living Eubacteria|
|Photosynthetic apparatus||The presence of two photosystems (PS I and PS II) in which a central chlorophyll a molecule is oxidized; electrolysis of H2O as electron donor and release of O2; similarities in the electron transport chains; shared phycobilisomes between Cyanobacteria and Glaucophyta and Rhodophyta|
Three extant groups of photosynthetic eukaryotes have primary plastids: the green plants, red algae, and the glaucophytes. Together they make up the Archaeplastida. Even though the cyanobacterial origin of the plastids in these groups is beyond dispute, the number of endosymbiotic events and the relationships among the three lineages is more contentious (Delwiche, 1999; Delwiche, 2007). For a long time, variation in plastid structure and light-harvesting pigments has given credit to a polyphyletic origin of primary plastids, i.e. the hypothesis that primary plastids resulted from multiple independent primary endosymbiotic events. Recent evidence points toward a single origin of primary plastids, which implies a single ancestor of the plastid as well as the monophyly of the three lineages that make up the Archaeplastida (Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2005; Keeling, 2010). As pointed out by Larkum et al. (2007), however, support for a single origin of plastids should be treated with caution and several lines of evidence, which are predominantly based on phylogenetic tree methods, may not disprove all alternative scenarios of plastid acquisition. There is at least one exception to this rule: Paulinella chromatophora, a cercozoan amoeba with photosynthetic inclusion of cyanobacterial origin (Marin et al. 2005; Nowack et al. 2011; Nowack & Grossman 2012).
Even though several analyses provide moderate to strong support for a monophyletic Archaeplastida (Burki et al., 2009; Burki et al., 2007; Hackett et al., 2007; Patron, Inagaki & Keeling, 2007; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2005), other studies suggest that the Archaeplastida might be paraphyletic with respect to the Hacrobia (Hampl et al., 2009; Burki et al. 2012) or the entire Chromalveolata (Baurain et al., 2010; Nozaki et al., 2009) (Fig 1A-D). The incongruence between analyses is likely caused by systematic biases including endosymbiotic gene transfer as suggested by the high instability of resultant topologies of photosynthetic clades with varying levels of taxon sampling and missing data (Parfrey et al., 2010). Indeed gene sampling has been shown to account for at least some of the incongruence among the relationships of primary plastid lineages (Inagaki et al., 2009). The persistent incongruence of large concatenated datasets shows that a solution may not be found by increasing sequence length (Baurain et al., 2010; Burki et al., 2009; Hampl et al., 2009). Instead when relaxing the assumption of vertical gene transfer by abandoning concatenation and choosing for a gene-by-gene approach, Chan et al. (2011) and Price et al. (2012) provide additional evidence for monophyly of red and green algae.
In the light of the persistent uncertainty on the monophyly of Archaeplastida, it may not come as a surprise that the relationships between green plants, red algae and glaucophytes are still unclear. Traditionally, glaucophytes are thought to have diverged before the red algae and green plants, based on similarities of the plastid with cyanobacteria, such as the presence of a peptidoglycan layer surrounding the plastids (originally named “cyanelles”). Phylogenetic gene analyses are unfortunately not conclusive on the relationships between the major clades of the Archaeplastida (Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2005; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2007). Furthermore, several studies point towards an early diverging red algal lineage (Burki et al., 2009; Hackett et al., 2007; Patron et al., 2007), although this result might be biased by the inclusion of clades with secondary plastids (Deschamps & Moreira, 2009). Therefore analyses concentrating on EGT genes of cyanobacterial origin only might be more trustworthy. Even so, phylogenetic analyses are ambiguous, either suggesting the glaucophytes (Reyes-Prieto & Bhattacharya, 2007) or green lineage (Deschamps & Moreira, 2009) as earliest diverging lineage within the Archaeplastida.
Under the assumption of a single origin of primary plastids, the question remains what kind of cyanobacterium participated in the origin of plastids. Unfortunately, due to the large divergence times and the considerable extent of horizontal gene transfer between cyanobacteria (Deusch et al. 2008), the phylogenetic signal of these relationships is seriously eroded. Some studies suggest a rather deep origin of plastids, predating diversification of most extant cyanobacterial lineages (Criscuolo & Gribaldo, 2011; Reyes-Prieto et al., 2010; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2005; Sato, Wise & Hoober, 2006), other studies suggest plastids are more closely related to one of the contemporary clades such as N-fixing subsection I (Deschamps et al., 2008; Falcon, Magallon & Castillo, 2010) or filamentous heterocyst-forming subsection IV (Deusch et al., 2008). In addition, it is difficult to determine when this primary endosymbiosis occurred. Estimates based on fossil evidence and biomarkers are widely divergent (Knoll, 1992). A recent calibrated phylogeny of Parfrey et al. (2011) corroborates earlier studies with an estimated ages of the clade containing Viridiplantae, red algae and glaucophytes around 1.5-1.6 billion years ago (Hedges et al., 2004; Yoon et al., 2004) (Fig 1E). Following the origin of Archaeplastida, photosynthesis spread widely among diverse eukaryotic groups via secondary and tertiary endosymbiotic events (Archibald, 2009; Gould et al., 2008; Keeling, 2010). Overviews of the intricate histories of plastid acquisition are provided in Archibald (2012).
II. Red algae
A. Red algae defined
The red algae or Rhodophyta are a distinct lineage of eukaryotic algae, containing about 5,000–6,000 species of mostly multicellular, marine algae. The red algae are distinguishable amongst eukaryotic lineages by a combination of biochemical and ultrastructural features, some of which they share with Glaucophyta and Cyanobacteria. First, red algal plastids lack chlorophyll accessorypigments. Instead light energy is directed to the reaction centre by phycobiliproteins (phycocyanin, allophycocyanin, and phycoerythrin). Light harvesting antennae pigments are grouped in hemispherical protein complexes, phycobilisomes, anchored to the thylakoids. These are not stacked in grana like in the Viridiplantae, but lie singly and more or less equidistant in the plastid stroma. One of the most distinctive characters of the red algae is the complete absence of flagella and centrioles in all life stages, which affects mitosis and, at least in some groups, their life cycles (Graham, Graham & Wilcox, 2009; Maggs, Verbruggen & De Clerck, 2007; Saunders & Hommersand, 2004; van den Hoek, Mann & Jahns, 1995; Yoon et al., 2006b; Yoon, Zuccarello & Bhattacharya, 2010).
From the early twentieth century until very recently red algae were classified in two distinct groups, most commonly treated as classes, Bangiophyceae and Florideophyceae, within a single phylum, Rhodophyta. This dichotomy in the classification is reflected in the morphological complexity that characterizes the red algae, with the Bangiophyceae uniting the morphologically simple forms (unicells, or undifferentiated filaments and blades) and the Florideophyceae containing the more complex growth forms. Growth in the Florideophyceae is essentially filamentous but individual filaments may aggregate to form a pseudoparenchymatous tissue. Growth forms include filaments, blades, elaborately branched thalli as well as calcified crusts (coralline algae). A wealth of molecular and ultrastructural data, however, made clear that this traditional classification did not reflect the antiquity and diversity of the rhodophytes (Müller, Lynch & Sheath, 2010; Müller et al., 2001; Oliveira & Bhattacharya, 2000). The structurally simple Bangiophyceae is composed of a series of radiations that define the ancestral lineages of the red algae, and part of the traditionally circumscribed Bangiophyceae is more closely related to the Florideophyceae. Hence, a new classification was originally proposed by Saunders & Hommersand (2004) and subsequently refined by Yoon et al. (2006). The phylum Rhodophyta is now subdivided into two subphyla, Cyanidiophytina and Rhodophytina, and seven classes, Cyanidiophyceae, Bangiophyceae, Compsopogonophyceae, Florideophyceae, Porphyridiophyceae, Rhodellophyceae and Stylonematophyceae (Fig. 2). The diversity contained in the Compsopogonophyceae, Porphyridiophyceae, Rhodellophyceae and Stylonematophyceae is still ill-defined as can be witnessed by the many unnamed lineages that typically adorn phylogenetic trees (Scott et al., 2008; West et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2010; Yokoyama et al., 2009; Zuccarello, Kikuchi & West, 2010; Zuccarello et al., 2009; Zuccarello, West & Kikuchi, 2008; Zuccarello et al., 2011).
Red algae are an ancient lineage (Xiao, Zhang & Knoll, 1998; Yoon et al., 2004). A 1.2 billion year old fossil, Bangiomorpha pubescens (Butterfield, 2000), that bears a lot of resemblance to extant Bangia species, is regarded as the oldest taxonomically resolved eukaryotic fossil. The taxonomic affinity of Bangiomorpha was long contested, with some authors (e.g. Cavalier-Smith, 2006) advocating that Bangiomorpha is a blue-green alga or a mixture of at least two species of blue-green algae, possibly related to the Stigonematales. Bangiomorpha being a eukaryotic fossil would indicate a Mesoproterozoic origin of red algae and by extension all major lineages of the eukaryotes, which contradicts the hypothesis of Cavalier-Smith that places eukaryogenesis at 850 Ma (Cavalier-Smith, 2010). A red algal nature of Bangiomorpha, however, is not in conflict with the most recent timing of eukaryotic diversification using calibrated phylogenies (Parfrey et al., 2011) or the interpretation of several microfossils that place the origin of the eukaryotes at around 1800 Ma (Knoll et al., 2006). In addition to the fossils indicative of a Mesoproterozoic origin of red algae, the remarkably well-preserved multicellular red algae from the Doushantuo Formation in southern China (ca. 600 Ma) are clear proof that red algae had already radiated prior to the Precambrian radiation.
The updated classification of the red algae also better reflects the ultrastructural and ecological diversity of the group. Of special interest are the Cyanidiophyceae, a group of unicellular and presumably asexual algae, which live in thermo-acidophilic conditions that are detrimental to most eukaryotic live on earth (Barbier et al., 2005; Ciniglia et al., 2004; Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Yoon et al., 2006a). Yoon et al. (2004) suggested that the Cyanidiophyceae diverged from the remaining red algae prior to the secondary endosymbiotic event that gave rise to the Chromalveolata. Even though a reinterpretation of this event is necessary now that the chromalveolate hypothesis is being increasingly challenged (Archibald, 2012; Baurain et al., 2010), it does vouch for the antiquity of the divergences that separate the deep red algal lineages. Because the Cyanidiophyceae are one of few eukaryotic groups that thrive in environments that are otherwise dominated by Archaea and Bacteria, their enzymes are of special interest to the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry. It is, therefore, not surprising that Cyanidioschyzon merolae was the first eukaryotic alga for which a full genome sequence was available (Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Misumi et al., 2005) and the genome of the related Galdieria sulphuraria is currently being sequenced (Barbier et al., 2005). The small and compact genome of C. merolae, combined with an extremely reduced cell architecture (one nucleus, mitochondrion and chloroplast, and the absence of a cell wall), makes it an ideal organisms to address the synchronization and mechanisms of the organellar division during cytokinesis (Kuroiwa, 1998). Only seven Cyanidiophyceae species are currently described but this number severely underestimates the diversity. Applying environmental sequencing from a single locality in Italy, Ciniglia et al. (2004) unveiled considerable cryptic diversity and within-lineage (often ‘intraspecific’) sequence divergence that is comparable, for example, to between-order divergences in the non-Cyanidiales red algae.
C. Of nori and red seaweed
The great majority of red algae are multicellular, marine seaweeds, with an enormous range of morphologies and complex haplo-diploid life histories which involve additional zygote amplification stages resulting in large numbers of spores from a single fertilization (Verbruggen et al., 2010). Red seaweeds belong nearly exclusively to two classes, Bangiophyceae (in the narrow sense of the new classification) and Florideophyceae (Fig. 2). Traditionally, two genera belonging to a single family, Bangiaceae, have been recognized in the Bangiophyceae. Unbranched uniseriate to multiseriate ﬁlaments have been placed in the genus Bangia and blades in the genus Porphyra (Sutherland et al., 2011). The latter genus is commonly known as “nori”, which is cultivated as one of the most proﬁtable mariculture crops in the north-western Pacific (Niwa et al., 2009). Molecular phylogenetic analyses resulted in the recognition of fifteen genera, seven ﬁlamentous and eight foliose, which are only separable on molecular rather than morphological grounds. Regrettably, this taxonomic vigour also resulted in the fact that the Porphyra, which has wrapped sushi for decades, has now become a Pyropia (Zuccarello, 2011).
The near-morphological stasis that characterizes the Bangiophyceae, contrasts sharply with the wealth of growth forms that is encountered in its sister taxon, the Florideophyceae. DNA sequence data have progressively refined an ordinal classification (e.g. Choi et al., 2002; Harper & Saunders, 2001; Le Gall & Saunders, 2007; Saunders, Chiovitti & Kraft, 2004), which was originally entirely based on morphological and reproductive features (Maggs et al., 2007). The Florideophyceae now includes some 25 orders grouped into five subclasses, Hildenbrandiophycidae, Nemaliophycidae, Ahnfeltiophycidae, Rhodymeniophycidae and Corallinophycidae (Le Gall & Saunders, 2007; Maggs et al., 2007; Saunders & Hommersand, 2004), which are reasonably well supported by ultrastructural characters. Ordinal relationships, however, remain at least partly unresolved (Verbruggen et al., 2010) and form the motivation of a Red Tree of Life project (http://dblab.rutgers.edu/redtol/).
Genomic data of red seaweeds are currently limited to a number of organelle genomes and EST libraries of commercially important species such as Chondrus, Gracilaria, and Porphyra (Asamizu et al., 2003; Collen et al., 2006; Hagopian et al., 2004; Nikaido et al., 2000) and the coralline red alga Calliarthrontuberculosum (Chan et al., 2011), but this may change soon with whole genome project of the carragenophyte Chondruscrispus and Porphyraumbilicalis in progress.
III. Green plants (Viridiplantae)
A. Green plants defined
The green plant clade (Viridiplantae) includes green algae and embryophytic land plants, and is one of the main groups of photosynthetic eukaryotes. Green plants are diverse in terms of species number, morphology, biochemistry and ecology. Monophyly of the group is well established based on ultrastructural, biochemical and molecular data (Leliaert et al., 2012; Lewis & McCourt, 2004).
Green plants share a number of unique characteristics. The chloroplasts are surrounded by a double membrane, have thylakoids grouped in lamellae, and contain chlorophyll a and b along with some accessory pigments including carotenoids and xanthophylls. Pyrenoids (when present) are embedded within the chloroplast and are surrounded by starch, which is the main reserve polysaccharide. Cell walls (when present) are generally composed of cellulose. Many green algae are flagellates or have flagellate cells in some stage of the life cycle. The flagella (generally two or four on a cell) are isokont, which means that they are similar in structure, although they may differ in length. The region between the flagellar axoneme and the basal body is characterized by a stellate structure (Graham et al., 2009; van den Hoek et al., 1995).
Apart from these unifying ultrastructural and biochemical features, green plants are extremely diverse morphologically. They range from unicells with sizes comparable to bacteria to large and complex multicellular or siphonal life forms. Although the described species diversity of land plants (including over 250,000 species) exceeds that of green algae (about 15,000 named species), green algae encompass a greater cytomorphological, biochemical and reproductive diversity, which reflects their old evolutionary age (Leliaert et al., 2012). The progenitor of green plants was likely a unicellular flagellate or at least had flagellate stages in its life cycle. Colonial and multicellular forms have evolved multiple times in several lineages, including the Streptophyta, Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae and Palmophyllales (Fig. 2).
Green plants are also ecologically very diverse. They are especially abundant in freshwater (most charophytes, Chlorophyceae and Trebouxiophyceae) and marine environments (Ulvophyceae and prasinophytes) but some have adapted to specific habitats, such as dry land (Lewis & Lewis, 2005; López-Bautista, Rindi & Guiry, 2006), arctic (De Wever et al., 2009) and marine deep water environments (Zechman et al., 2010). Several members of the core chlorophytes live in symbiosis with a diverse array of eukaryotes (Friedl & Bhattacharya, 2002; Kerney et al., 2011; Lewis & Muller-Parker, 2004), or have adopted a heterotrophic life style as parasites (Joubert & Rijkenberg, 1971; Sudman, 1974). Embryophytes have dominated terrestrial habitats for millions of years; some land plants have adapted secondarily to freshwater or marine environments.
B. Evolutionary history of green plants
Green plants have played a significant ecological role for millions of years (Leliaert, Verbruggen & Zechman, 2011; O’Kelly, 2007). The ecological importance of green algae has been mainly in marine and freshwater environments. The origin of land plants from a green algal ancestor was a key event in the evolution of life on earth. This event initiated the development of the entire terrestrial ecosystem and has led to environmental changes on a global scale (Kenrick & Crane, 1997). Time calibrated phylogenies, calibrated with the scarce fossil record, have estimated the origin of the green plant lineage somewhere between 700 and 1500 Ma (Berney & Pawlowski, 2006; Hedges et al., 2004; Herron et al., 2009; Yoon et al., 2004). An early split in the evolution of green plants gave rise to two main clades: the Chlorophyta and Streptophyta (Leliaert et al., 2012; Lemieux, Otis & Turmel, 2007; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2007) (Fig. 2).
The Chlorophyta probably diversified as unicellular algae in the Meso- and Neoproterozoic. These green algae were dominant in the oceanic phytoplankton of the Paleozoic as evidenced by fossil deposits of resistant outer walls of prasinophytic cysts, known as phycomata (Colbath, 1983; Knoll, 1992; O’Kelly, 2007; Tappan, 1980). This early radiation of Chlorophyta was important to the eukaryotic greening that shaped the geochemistry of our planet (Worden et al., 2009). During the Mesozoic, the dominance of marine green algae in the phytoplankton gradually decreased as they were largely displaced by the red-plastid-containing dinoflagellates, coccolithophores and diatoms (Falkowski et al., 2004; O’Kelly, 2007; Simon et al., 2009; Leliaert et al., 2011). These ancestral green unicells gave rise to modern prasinophytes and the core Chlorophyta that diversified as unicellular and multicellular organism in marine, freshwater and terrestrial habitats.
The Streptophyta probably originated in the Neoproterozoic and diversified as unicellular algae in freshwater environments (Becker & Marin, 2009). Two important groups of multicellular charophytes diversified during the Paleozoic: the conjugating green algae (Zygnematophyceae) and stoneworts (Charophyceae) (Becker & Marin, 2009). Similar to the situation in marine environments, red-plastid containing dinoflagellates, diatoms and chrysophytes gradually took over the green dominance in Early Cretaceous and Cenozoic freshwater ecosystems (Becker & Marin, 2009). Ancestral charophytes invaded the land during the mid-Ordovician and early Silurian (480-430 million years ago), giving rise to the land plants (Delaux et al., 2012; McCourt, Delwiche & Karol, 2004).
Molecular phylogenetic studies have drastically reshaped our views of green plant evolution and continue to do so (Leliaert et al., 2012; Marin, 2012; Timme, Bachvaroff & Delwiche, 2012). However, many uncertainties remain, especially about the deepest branches of the green plants. One of the main goals of the Green Algal Tree of Life Project (http://alleyn.eeb.uconn.edu/gratol/) is to resolve relationships among the main green algal lineages. Phylogenetic hypotheses are critical in providing an evolutionary framework for comparative genomic studies. In the following section, we give a brief overview of the major green plant lineages and their relationships.
The Chlorophyta form a large and morphologically diverse clade of marine, freshwater and terrestrial green algae. The flagellar apparatus in this clade is characterized by a symmetrical cruciate root system wherein rootlets of variable (X) numbers of microtubules alternate with rootlets composed of two microtubules to form a “X-2-X-2” arrangement. The orientation of this flagellar root system has been an important character for defining the main groups of Chlorophyta. Molecular data has revealed several major chlorophytan clades. Several early diverging clades of unicellular algae, collectively termed the prasinophytes, form a paraphyletic assemblage at the base of the chlorophytan tree. These clades are relatively species-poor compared to the three principal clades of the core Chlorophyta: Ulvophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae and Chlorophyceae (Fig. 2).
Prasinophytes form a heterogeneous assemblage of mostly unicellular algae with diverse cell shapes that are naked, covered by walls or organic body scales; flagella are present or absent (Leliaert et al., 2011; Melkonian, 1990; Sym & Pienaar, 1993). Mitotic processes, biochemical features and photosynthetic pigments are equally diverse, reflecting the paraphyletic nature of the group (Fawley, Yun & Qin, 2000; Guillou et al., 2004; Latasa et al., 2004; Nakayama et al., 1998; Zingone et al., 2002). Prasinophytes are predominantly found in marine environments, although several species also occur in freshwater. About ten distinct prasinophyte lineages have been identified, but their phylogenetic affinities remain largely unresolved (Leliaert et al., 2011; Leliaert et al., 2012; Marin & Melkonian, 2010; Turmel et al., 2009) (Fig. 2).
The Nephroselmidophyceae includes flagellates with complex scale covering, and is possibly one of the earliest diverging chlorophytan lineages (Turmel et al., 2009). Although Nephroselmis is one of the few prasinophytes where sexual reproduction has been observed (Suda, Watanabe & Inouye, 2004), genomic evidence, such as the identification of meiosis related genes, indicates that sexual reproduction is probably more widespread among prasinophytes (Derelle et al., 2006; Worden et al., 2009). Future population genomic studies may enable us to estimate the prevalence of sexual recombination in algae (Toulza et al. 2012).
The Mamiellophyceae includes the morphologically and ecologically diverse Mamiellales and two smaller clades, the Monomastigales and Dolichomastigales (Marin & Melkonian, 2010; Nakayama, Kawachi & Inouye, 2000; Sym & Pienaar, 1993; Turmel et al., 2009; Zingone et al., 2002). The Mamiellales include marine and freshwater flagellates and coccoid forms. Species of Ostreococcus and Micromonas are among the smallest eukaryotes known, with cell sizes of 0.5-2 µm (Derelle et al., 2006; Palenik et al., 2007; Worden et al., 2009) and are important components of marine picoeukaryotic communities (O’Kelly et al., 2003; Not et al., 2004; Vaulot et al., 2008; Leliaert et al., 2012). We refer to Toulza et al. (2012) for a review on environmental genomics in the Mamiellales.
The Pyramimonadales includes large flagellates covered by complex body scales, found in marine and freshwater environments. Some species are unique among green plants in possessing a food uptake apparatus (Moestrup, Inouye & Hori, 2003), which has been interpreted as a character that might have been inherited from a phagotrophic ancestor of the green plants (O’Kelly, 2007).
The Picocystis clade includes the coccoid Picocystis from saline lakes. Together with some undescribed coccoids (“CCMP1205 clade”), these prasinophytes might form the closest sister lineages of the core chlorophytes, although strong support is lacking (Marin & Melkonian, 2010).
Several other prasinophytic groups have uncertain phylogenetic affinities. These include the Pycnococcaceae, a clade of marine flagellate and coccoid species (Nakayama et al., 2007; Turmel et al., 2009); the Prasinococcales, a clade of marine coccoids (Hasegawa et al., 1996; Sieburth et al., 1999); and two clades (“clades VIII and IX”) that are known from environmental sequencing only (Lepère, Vaulot & Scanlan, 2009; Shi et al., 2009; Viprey et al., 2008).
The Palmophyllales includes green algae from dimly lit benthic marine habitats. These algae feature a unique type of multicellularity, forming well-defined macroscopic bodies composed of small spherical cells embedded in a firm gelatinous matrix. Phylogenetic analysis either places the Palmophyllales as the sister clade to all other Chlorophyta or allies it with the Prasinococcales (Leliaert et al., 2011; Zechman et al., 2010).
The core Chlorophyta evolved from one of the ancestral prasinophytic lineages probably somewhere in the Neoproterozoic (Herron et al., 2009). The core Chlorophyta includes the species-poor and early-diverging Pedinophyceae (marine and freshwater uniflagellates) and Chlorodendrophyceae (marine and freshwater quadriflagellates), and the large and diverse clades, Trebouxiophyceae, Ulvophyceae and Chlorophyceae (TUC) (Leliaert et al., 2012; Marin, 2012). The TUC clades include a wide variety of morphological forms and eco-physiological features. Unlike the prasinophytes, where sexual reproduction has rarely been observed, the core chlorophytes encompass a large diversity of life cycle strategies, many of which involve sexual reproduction. Marine members of the Ulvophyceae generally have life cycles involving an alternation between two free-living multicellular phases (a haploid gametophyte and diploid sporophyte). Many freshwater Chlorophyceae and Trebouxiophyceae have a haploid vegetative phase and a single-celled, often dormant zygote as the diploid phase. Conversely, terrestrial members of the core chlorophytes are mainly asexual (Rindi, 2011). We refer Umen and Olson (2012) for a review on the evolution of sex in the chlorophycean green algae Chlamydomonas and Volvox.
A new mode of cell division likely evolved in the clade uniting the Chlorodendrophyceae and the TUC clade and was subsequently lost in the Ulvophyceae (Leliaert et al., 2012). This type of cell division is mediated by a phycoplast, which is an array of microtubules oriented parallel to the plane of cell division, determining the formation of a new cell wall (Graham et al., 2009; van den Hoek et al., 1995). Morphological and eco-physiological adaptations probably allowed successful radiation of the Trebouxiophyceae and Chlorophyceae in freshwater and terrestrial habitats, and diversification of the Ulvophyceae along marine shorelines (Becker & Marin, 2009; Cocquyt et al., 2010; Leliaert et al., 2012).
The relationships among the core chlorophytan lineages are difficult to resolve, probably as a result of their antiquity and the short time span of diversification (O’Kelly, 2007; Cocquyt et al., 2010). Furthermore, some phylogenetic studies showed that at least the Trebouxiophyceae and Ulvophyceae might not be monophyletic (e.g. Turmel, Otis & Lemieux, 2009b; Zuccarello et al., 2009b; Lü et al., 2011) (but see Marin, 2012; Cocquyt et al., 2010).
The Trebouxiophyceae includes flagellates, coccoids, colonies, and multicellular filaments and blades. The group is predominantly freshwater or terrestrial; some members occur in brackish or marine habitats. Many species are photosynthetic symbionts with lichen fungi, various protists, invertebrates and plants; others have evolved a free-living or parasitic heterotrophic life style (Friedl & Rybalka, 2011; Leliaert et al., 2012). Analysis of the complete genome of Chlorella variabilis NC64A (an endosymbiont of the ciliate Paramecium bursaria) has provided insights into the genetic facilitation of an endosymbiotic lifestyle (Blanc et al., 2010). In particular expansion of protein families containing protein–protein interaction domains and adhesion domains could have been involved in adaptation to symbiosis. Although Chlorella (and many other members of Trebouxiophyceae) has been assumed to be asexual and nonmotile, meiosis- and flagella-specific proteins have been found in its genome, suggestive of cryptic sex and involvement of a flagella-derived structure in sexual reproduction (Blanc et al., 2010).
The Chlorophyceae includes flagellates, coccoids and various colonial and multicellular forms. The group occurs mainly in freshwater and to a lesser extent in terrestrial habitats; some are marine (Klochkova et al., 2008). Five main lineages have been recognized: the speciose and diverse Sphaeropleales and Chlamydomonadales including some of the most common freshwater phytoplankters, and the smaller clades, Chaetophorales, Oedogoniales and Chaetopeltidales (Leliaert et al., 2012). The unicellular flagellate Chlamydomonas has been extensively studied as a model for photosynthesis, chloroplast biogenesis, flagellar assembly and function, cell-cell recognition, circadian rhythm and cell cycle control (Grossman et al., 2003). The colonial Volvox has served as a model for the evolution of multicellularity, cell differentiation, and colony motility (Herron & Michod, 2008; Kirk, 2003). Analysis of the complete genomes of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Volvox carteri has provided important genetic insights into the evolution of multicellularity and sex (Merchant et al., 2007; Prochnik et al., 2010; Umen & Olson 2012).
The Ulvophyceae includes unicells and multicellular algae, as well as giant-celled forms with unique cellular characteristics (Cocquyt et al., 2010; Leliaert et al., 2012). Ulvophytes are generally known as macro-algae growing along marine coasts (green seaweeds). Species in the Ulvales, Bryopsidales and Cladophorales frequently dominate rocky shores, tropical lagoons and reefs. Some species of Ulva can form extensive, free-floating blooms, known as green tides (Ye et al., 2011). Caulerpa and Codium species are notorious for their invasive nature (Williams & Smith, 2007). Several ulvophytes (e.g. Ulva and Cladophora) have secondarily adapted to freshwater environments. The Trentepohliales is atypical with respect to both morphology and ecology, occurring exclusively in terrestrial habitats (López-Bautista & Chapman, 2003). Some early diverging lineages (Oltmannsiellopsidales and Ignatius) include microscopic organisms occurring in freshwater or terrestrial habitats, indicating that the ancestral ulvophytes may have been freshwater or terrestrial unicells (Cocquyt et al., 2010).
D. Streptophyta and the origin of land plants
The Streptophyta include a paraphyletic assemblage of green algae (charophytes) and the land plants. Charophytes range in morphology from unicellular to complex multicellular organisms, and occur in freshwater or moist terrestrial habitats. Streptophyta share a number of unique traits, including motile cells (when present) with two subapically inserted flagella and an asymmetrical flagellar apparatus that contains a distinctive multilayered structure and parallel basal bodies; open mitosis with a persistent mitotic spindle; and several unique enzymes (Leliaert et al., 2012). There are six main lineages of charophytes: Mesostigmatophyceae, Chlorokybophyceae, Klebsormidiophyceae, Zygnematophyceae, Charophyceae and Coleochaetophyceae (McCourt et al., 2004) (Fig. 2). Many phylogenetic studies have aimed to resolve the relationship among these lineages, and in particular to determine the origins of land plants (Karol et al., 2001; Lemieux et al., 2007; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2007; Timme et al., 2012; Wodniok et al., 2011).
Mesostigma (Mesostigmatophyceae) and Chlorokybus (Chlorokybophyceae) form the earliest-diverging streptophytic lineages (Timme et al., 2012) (Fig. 2). Mesostigma is a flagellate covered with diverse organic scales, and is found in freshwater habitats. Chlorokybus forms packets of a few non-motile cells, and grows in moist terrestrial environments (McCourt et al., 2004). The freshwater or terrestrial filamentous Klebsormidiophyceae diverged after the Mesostigmatophyceae and Chlorokybophyceae.
In contrast to these three early-diverging lineages that undergo cell division by furrowing, the remaining lineages (Charophyceae, Zygnematophyceae, Coleochaetophyceae and the land plants) evolved a new mechanism of cell division involving a phragmoplast, which consists of an array of microtubules oriented perpendicularly to the plane of cell division, determining the formation of the cell plate and new cell wall. Most of these later-diverging streptophytes also have cell walls with plasmodesmata, facilitating cytoplasmic communication between cells and development of complex tissues (Graham, Cook & Busse, 2000). Species in the three early-diverging lineages have never been observed to reproduce sexually, in contrasts to the remaining streptophytes where sex is widespread (McCourt et al., 2004).
The Zygnematophyceae (conjugating green algae) is a species-rich and morphologically diverse clade, including non-motile unicells, filaments and small colonial forms. Sexual reproduction occurs by a unique process of conjugation, involving fusion of non-motile gametes. Flagellate stages are completely absent. The Charophyceae (stoneworts) include freshwater algae with complex macroscopic bodies composed of a main axis with whorled branches. Growth is by an apical meristematic cell. Sexual reproduction is oogamous with oogonia and antheridia surrounded by sterile cells. Charophyceae are well represented in the fossil record, which a large diversity extending back to the Silurian (McCourt et al., 2004).
The Coleochaetophyceae is a small clade of branched filaments that sometimes form discoid parenchymatous thalli (Graham, 1984). Based on morphological similarities with embryophytes, Coleochaete has traditionally been put forward as the closest relative of land plants (Graham, 1984; Graham et al., 2000). For example, some species of Coleochaete have corticated zygotes that are retained on the mother plant from which they receive nourishment via placental transfer cells with wall ingrowths. Also, cytokinesis and phragmoplast formation are similar to land plants (Graham et al., 2000).
Identifying the closest living relative of land plants has proven to be a difficult task (Cocquyt et al., 2010; Karol et al., 2001; Lemieux et al., 2007; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2007; Turmel et al., 2009; Turmel, Otis & Lemieux, 2006; Turmel, Otis & Lemieux, 2007). Two recent studies based on broad phylogenomic sampling have suggested the Zygnematophyceae as sister lineage of the land plants (Timme et al., 2012; Wodniok et al., 2011). Although the two lineages share few morphological characteristics, the sister relationship between Zygnematophyceae and land plants is supported by some cellular and molecular features, including similarities in auxin signalling (De Smet et al., 2011) and chloroplast movement (Wada, Kagawa & Sato, 2003).
The Glaucophyta (also known as Glaucocystophyta) is a small and inconspicuous group of unicellular algae found in freshwater and terrestrial environments (Baldauf, 2008; Bhattacharya & Schmidt, 1997; Kies & Kremer, 1990; Schenk, 2001). The importance of the group lies mainly in its critical phylogenetic position, branching deeply within the Archaeplastida (Fig. 1) (Bhattacharya et al., 1995; Moreira, Le Guyader & Philippe, 2000; Nozaki et al., 2009; Price et al., 2012; Reyes-Prieto & Bhattacharya, 2007; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2005).
Glaucophytes are unique among photosynthetic eukaryotes in that they contain unusual plastids (originally named “cyanelles”) with several characteristics reminiscent of Cyanobacteria: plastids are surrounded by a prokaryote-type peptidoglycan wall (except for Glaucosphaera vacuolata) and contain only chlorophyll a and phycobilins (Steiner & Löffelhardt, 2002; Steiner et al., 2005). Similar to red algae, plastids have unstacked thylakoids and light-harvesting proteins organized into phycobilisomes. About 13 species have been described in five genera: Glaucocystis, including coccoid cells with a cellulosic wall and two short rudimentary flagella; Cyanophora and Peliaina are wall-less flagellates with two heterokont flagella; and Gloeochaete and Cyanoptyche, including non-motile cells in a gelatinous matrix, reproducing by motile or non-motile spores (Schenk, 2001).
To date, the genome of a single glaucophyte has been sequenced (Price et al., 2012; Stirewalt et al., 1995). Genomic data and a better understanding of the phylogenetic position of glaucophytes will provide valuable insights into the endosymbiotic origin and evolution of plastids in eukaryotes.
V. Archaeplastida genome studies
Genomic data are rapidly accumulating. To date about ten complete genomes have been sequenced, but several other genome projects are ongoing (Tirichine & Bowler, 2011). Whole-genome data provide a great resource for analysis of eukaryotic genome evolution and user friendly online platforms for exploring this genome information is becoming increasingly available (e.g. Pico-Plaza, http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/pico-plaza/ (Van Bel et al., 2012).
Acquisti, C., Kleffe, J. & Collins, S. (2007). Oxygen content of transmembrane proteins over macroevolutionary time scales. Nature 445, 47-52.
Allen, J. F. & Martin, W. (2007). Evolutionary biology – Out of thin air. Nature 445, 610-612.
Archibald, J. M. (2009). The puzzle of plastid evolution. Current Biology 19, R81-R88.
Archibald, J. (2012). The evolution of algae by secondary and tertiary endosymbiosis. Advances in Botanical Research, 64, 87–118.
Asamizu, E., Nakajima, M., Kitade, Y., Saga, N., Nakamura, Y. & Tabata, S. (2003). Comparison of RNA expression proﬁles between the two generations of Porphyra yezoensis (Rhodophyta), based on expressed sequence tag frequency analysis. Journal of Phycology 39, 923-930.
Baldauf, S. L. (2008). An overview of the phylogeny and diversity of eukaryotes. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46, 263-273.
Barbier, G., Oesterhelt, C., Larson, M. D., Halgren, R. G., Wilkerson, C., Garavito, R. M., Benning, C. & Weber, A. P. M. (2005). Comparative genomics of two closely related unicellular thermo-acidophilic red algae, Galdieria sulphuraria and Cyanidioschyzon merolae, reveals the molecular basis of the metabolic flexibility of Galdieria sulphuraria and significant differences in carbohydrate metabolism of both algae. Plant Physiology 137, 460-474.
Baurain, D., Brinkmann, H., Petersen, J., Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, N., Stechmann, A., Demoulin, V., Roger, A. J., Burger, G., Lang, B. F. & Philippe, H. (2010). Phylogenomic Evidence for Separate Acquisition of Plastids in Cryptophytes, Haptophytes, and Stramenopiles. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27, 1698-1709.
Becker, B. & Marin, B. (2009). Streptophyte algae and the origin of embryophytes. Annals of Botany 103, 999-1004.
Berney, C. & Pawlowski, J. (2006). A molecular time-scale for eukaryote evolution recalibrated with the continuous microfossil record. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273, 1867-1872.
Bhattacharya, D., Archibald, J. M., Weber, A. P. M. & Reyes-Prieto, A. (2007). How do endosymbionts become organelles? Understanding early events in plastid evolution. BioEssays 29, 1239-1246.
Bhattacharya, D., Helmchen, T., Bibeau, C. & Melkonian, M. (1995). Comparisons of nuclear-encoded small-subunit ribosomal RNAs reveal the evolutionary position of the Glaucocystophyta. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12, 415-420.
Bhattacharya, D. & Schmidt, H. A. (1997). Division Glaucocystophyta. Plant Systematics and Evolution Supplement 11, 139-148.
Blanc, G., Duncan, G., Agarkova, I., Borodovsky, M., Gurnon, J., Kuo, A., Lindquist, E., Lucas, S., Pangilinan, J., Polle, J., Salamov, A., Terry, A., Yamada, T., Dunigan, D. D., Grigoriev, I. V., Claverie, J. M. & Van Etten, J. L. (2010). The Chlorella variabilis NC64A genome reveals adaptation to photosymbiosis, coevolution with viruses, and cryptic sex. Plant Cell 22, 2943-2955.
Buick, R. (2008). When did oxygenic photosynthesis evolve? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 363, 2731-2743.
Burki, F., Inagaki, Y., Brate, J., Archibald, J. M., Keeling, P. J., Cavalier-Smith, T., Sakaguchi, M., Hashimoto, T., Horak, A., Kumar, S., Klaveness, D., Jakobsen, K. S., Pawlowski, J. & Shalchian-Tabrizi, K. (2009). Large-scale phylogenomic analyses reveal that two enigmatic protist lineages, Telonemia and Centroheliozoa, are related to photosynthetic Chromalveolates. Genome Biology and Evolution 1, 231-238.
Burki, F., Okamoto, N., Pombert, J.-F. O. & Keeling, P. J. (2012). The evolutionary history of haptophytes and cryptophytes: phylogenomic evidence for separate origins. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2301
Burki, F., Shalchian-Tabrizi, K., Minge, M., Skjaeveland, A., Nikolaev, S. I., Jakobsen, K. S. & Pawlowski, J. (2007). Phylogenomics reshuffles the eukaryotic supergroups. Plos One 2.
Butterfield, N. J. (2000). Bangiomorpha pubescens n. gen., n. sp.: implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity, and the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes. Paleobiology 26, 386-404.
Canfield, D. E., Rosing, M. T. & Bjerrum, C. (2006). Early anaerobic metabolisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 361, 1819-1834.
Catling, D. C., Glein, C. R., Zahnle, K. J. & McKay, C. P. (2005). Why O(2) is required by complex life on habitable planets and the concept of planetary “oxygenation time”. Astrobiology 5, 415-438.
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2006). Phylogeny and megasystematics of phagotrophic heterokonts (kingdom Chromista). Journal of Molecular Evolution 62, 388-420.
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2010). Deep phylogeny, ancestral groups and the four ages of life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 365, 111-132.
Chan, C. X., Yang, E. C., Banerjee, T., Yoon, H. S., Martone, P. T., Estevez, J. M. & Bhattacharya, D. (2011). Red and Green Algal Monophyly and Extensive Gene Sharing Found in a Rich Repertoire of Red Algal Genes. Current Biology 21, 328-333.
Choi, H. G., Kraft, G. T., Lee, I. K. & Saunders, G. W. (2002). Phylogenetic analyses of anatomical and nuclear SSU rDNA sequence data indicate that the Dasyaceae and Delesseriaceae (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) are polyphyletic. European Journal of Phycology 37, 551-569.
Ciniglia, C., Yoon, H. S., Pollio, A., Pinto, G. & Bhattacharya, D. (2004). Hidden biodiversity of the extremophilic Cyanidiales red algae. Molecular Ecology 13, 1827-1838.
Cocquyt, E., Verbruggen, H., Leliaert, F. & De Clerck, O. (2010). Evolution and cytological diversification of the green seaweeds (Ulvophyceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 27, 2052-2061.
Colbath, G. K. (1983). Fossil prasinophycean phycomata (Chlorophyta) from the Silurian Bainbridge formation, Missouri, USA. Phycologia 22, 249-265.
Collen, J., Roeder, V., Rousvoal, S., Collin, O., Kloareg, B. & Boyen, C. (2006). An expressed sequence tag analysis of thallus and regenerating protoplasts of Chondrus crispus (Gigartinales, Rhodophyceae). Journal of Phycology 42, 104-112.
Criscuolo, A. & Gribaldo, S. (2011). Large-Scale Phylogenomic Analyses Indicate a Deep Origin of Primary Plastids within Cyanobacteria. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28, 3019-3032.
de Duve, C. (2007). Essay – The origin of eukaryotes: a reappraisal. Nature Reviews Genetics 8, 395-403.
De Smet, I., Voss, U., Lau, S., Wilson, M., Shao, N., Timme, R. E., Swarup, R., Kerr, I., Hodgman, C., Bock, R., Bennett, M., Jurgens, G. & Beeckman, T. (2011). Unraveling the evolution of auxin signaling. Plant Physiology 155, 209-221.
De Wever, A., Leliaert, F., Verleyen, E., Vanormelingen, P., Van der Gucht, K., Hodgson, D. A., Sabbe, K. & Vyverman, W. (2009). Hidden levels of phylodiversity in Antarctic green algae: further evidence for the existence of glacial refugia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 276, 3591-3599.
Delaux, P.-M., Nanda, A. K., Mathé, C., Sejalon-Delmas, N. & Dunand, C. 2012. Molecular and biochemical aspects of plant terrestrialization. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 14, 49-59.
Delwiche, C. F. (1999). Tracing the thread of plastid diversity through the tapestry of life. American Naturalist 154, S164-S177.
Delwiche, C. F. (2007). Algae in the warp and weave of life: bound by plastids. In “Unravelling the algae: the past, present, and future of algal systematics” (J. Brodie and J. Lewis, eds.), pp. 7-20. Taylor and Francis.
Derelle, E., Ferraz, C., Rombauts, S., Rouze, P., Worden, A. Z., Robbens, S., Partensky, F., Degroeve, S., Echeynie, S., Cooke, R., Saeys, Y., Wuyts, J., Jabbari, K., Bowler, C., Panaud, O., Piegu, B., Ball, S. G., Ral, J. P., Bouget, F. Y., Piganeau, G., De Baets, B., Picard, A., Delseny, M., Demaille, J., Van de Peer, Y. & Moreau, H. (2006). Genome analysis of the smallest free-living eukaryote Ostreococcus tauri unveils many unique features. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 11647-11652.
Deschamps, P., Colleoni, C., Nakamura, Y., Suzuki, E., Putaux, J. L., Buleon, A., Haebel, S., Ritte, G., Steup, M., Falcon, L. I., Moreira, D., Loffelhardt, W., Raj, J. N., Plancke, C., d’Hulst, C., Dauvillee, D. & Ball, S. (2008). Metabolic symbiosis and the birth of the plant kingdom. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 536-548.
Deschamps, P. & Moreira, D. (2009). Signal Conflicts in the Phylogeny of the Primary Photosynthetic Eukaryotes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26, 2745-2753.
Deusch, O., Landan, G., Roettger, M., Gruenheit, N., Kowallik, K. V., Allen, J. F., Martin, W. & Dagan, T. (2008). Genes of cyanobacterial origin in plant nuclear genomes point to a heterocyst-forming plastid ancestor. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 748-761.
Douzery, E. J. P., Snell, E. A., Bapteste, E., Delsuc, F. & Philippe, H. (2004). The timing of eukaryotic evolution: Does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 15386-15391.
Elias, M. & Archibald, J. M. (2009). Sizing up the genomic footprint of endosymbiosis. BioEssays 31, 1273-1279.
Embley, T. M. & Martin, W. (2006). Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges. Nature 440, 623-630.
Falcon, L. I., Magallon, S. & Castillo, A. (2010). Dating the cyanobacterial ancestor of the chloroplast. Isme Journal 4, 777-783.
Falkowski, P. G. (2006). Evolution – Tracing oxygen’s imprint on Earth’s metabolic evolution. Science 311, 1724-1725.
Falkowski, P. G., Katz, M. E., Knoll, A. H., Quigg, A., Raven, J. A., Schofield, O. & Taylor, F. J. R. (2004). The evolution of modern eukaryotic phytoplankton. Science 305, 354-360.
Farquhar, J., Zerkle, A. & Bekker, A. (2011). Geological constraints on the origin of oxygenic photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 107, 11-36.
Fawley, M. W., Yun, Y. & Qin, M. (2000). Phylogenetic analyses of 18S rDNA sequences reveal a new coccoid lineage of the Prasinophyceae (Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 36, 387-393.
Friedl, T. & Bhattacharya, D. (2002). Origin and evolution of green lichen algae. In “Symbiosis” (J. Seckbach, ed.), pp. 341-357. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Friedl, T. & Rybalka, N. (2011). Systematics of the Green Algae: A Brief Introduction to the Current Status. Progress in Botany 73, 259-280.
Gould, S. B., Waller, R. R. & McFadden, G. I. (2008). Plastid evolution. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59, 491-517.
Graham, L. E. (1984). Coleochaete and the origin of land plants. American Journal of Botany 71, 603-608.
Graham, L. E., Cook, M. E. & Busse, J. S. (2000). The origin of plants: Body plan changes contributing to a major evolutionary radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 4535-4540.
Graham, L. E., Graham, J. M. & Wilcox, L. W. (2009). Algae (2nd edition). Pearson Education, San Francisco.
Gross, J. & Bhattacharya, D. (2010). Uniting sex and eukaryote origins in an emerging oxygenic world. Biology Direct 5, 53.
Grossman, A. R., Harris, E. E., Hauser, C., Lefebvre, P. A., Martinez, D., Rokhsar, D., Shrager, J., Silflow, C. D., Stern, D., Vallon, O. & Zhang, Z. D. (2003). Chlamydomonas reinhardtii at the crossroads of genomics. Eukaryotic Cell 2, 1137-1150.
Guillou, L., Eikrem, W., Chretiennot-Dinet, M. J., Le Gall, F., Massana, R., Romari, K., Pedros-Alio, C. & Vaulot, D. (2004). Diversity of picoplanktonic prasinophytes assessed by direct nuclear SSU rDNA sequencing of environmental samples and novel isolates retrieved from oceanic and coastal marine ecosystems. Protist 155, 193-214.
Hackett, J. D., Yoon, H. S., Li, S., Reyes-Prieto, A., Rummele, S. E. & Bhattacharya, D. (2007). Phylogenomic analysis supports the monophyly of cryptophytes and haptophytes and the association of Rhizaria with Chromalveolates. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 1702-1713.
Hagopian, J. C., Reis, M., Kitajima, J. P., Bhattacharya, D. & De Oliveira, M. C. (2004). Comparative analysis of the complete plastid genome sequence of the red alga Gracilaria tenuistipitata var. liui provides insights into the evolution of rhodoplasts and their relationship to other plastids. Journal of Molecular Evolution 59, 464-477.
Hampl, V., Hug, L., Leigh, J. W., Dacks, J. B., Lang, B. F., Simpson, A. G. B. & Roger, A. J. (2009). Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic “supergroups”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 3859-3864.
Harper, J. T. & Saunders, G. W. (2001). Molecular systematics of the Florideophyceae (Rhodophyta) using nuclear large and small subunit rDNA sequence data. Journal of Phycology 37, 1073-1082.
Hasegawa, T., Miyashita, H., Kawachi, M., Ikemoto, H., Kurano, N., Miyachi, S. & Chihara, M. (1996). Prasinoderma coloniale gen. et sp. nov., a new pelagic coccoid prasinophyte from the western Pacific ocean. Phycologia 35, 170-176.
Hedges, S. B., Blair, J. E., Venturi, M. L. & Shoe, J. L. (2004). A molecular timescale of eukaryote evolution and the rise of complex multicellular life. BMC Evolutionary Biology 4.
Herron, M. D., Hackett, J. D., Aylward, F. O. & Michod, R. E. (2009). Triassic origin and early radiation of multicellular volvocine algae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 3254-3258.
Herron, M. D. & Michod, R. E. (2008). Evolution of complexity in the volvocine algae: Transitions in individuality through Darwin’s eye. Evolution 62, 436-451.
Hohmann-Marriott, M. F. & Blankenship, R. E. (2011). Evolution of Photosynthesis. In “Annual Review of Plant Biology”, Vol 62, vol. 62. Annual Review of Plant Biology (S. S. Merchant, W. R. Briggs and D. Ort, eds.), pp. 515-548.
Holland, H. D. (2006). The oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361, 903-915.
Inagaki, Y., Nakajima, Y., Sato, M., Sakaguchi, M. & Hashimoto, T. (2009). Gene sampling can bias multi-Gene phylogenetic inferences: the relationship between red algae and green plants as a case study. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26, 1171-1178.
Javaux, E. (2011). Early eukaryotes in precambrian oceans. In “Origins and Evolution of Life: an astrobiological perspective” (M. Gargaud, P.Lopez-Gracia and H.Martin, eds), pp. 414-449. Cambridge University Press.
Joubert, J. J. & Rijkenberg, F. H. J. (1971). Parasitic green algae. Annual Review of Phytopathology 9, 45-64.
Karol, K. G., McCourt, R. M., Cimino, M. T. & Delwiche, C. F. (2001). The closest living relatives of land plants. Science 294, 2351-2353.
Keeling, P. J. (2010). The endosymbiotic origin, diversification and fate of plastids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 365, 729-748.
Kenrick, P. & Crane, P. R. (1997). The origin and early evolution of plants on land. Nature 389, 33-39.
Kerney, R., Kim, E., Hangarter, R. P., Heiss, A. A., Bishop, C. D. & Hall, B. K. (2011). Intracellular invasion of green algae in a salamander host. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 6497-6502.
Kies, L. & Kremer, B. P. (1990). Phylum Glaucocsytophyta. In “Handbook of Protoctista. The structure, cultivation, habitats and life histories of the eukaryotic microorganisms and their descendants exclusive of animals, plants and fungi” (L. Margulis, J. O. Corliss, M. Melkonian and D. J. Chapman, eds.), pp. 152-166. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston.
Kirk, D. L. (2003). Seeking the ultimate and proximate causes of Volvox multicellularity and cellular differentiation. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43, 247-253.
Klochkova, T. A., Cho, G. Y., Boo, S. M., Chung, K. W., Kim, S. J. & Kim, G. H. (2008). Interactions between marine facultative epiphyte Chlamydomonas sp (Chlamydomonadales, Chlorophyta) and ceramiaceaen algae (Rhodophyta). Journal of Environmental Biology 29, 427-435.
Knoll, A. H. (1992). The early evolution of eukaryotes – a geological perspective. Science 256, 622-627.
Knoll, A. H., Javaux, E. J., Hewitt, D. & Cohen, P. (2006). Eukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 361, 1023-1038.
Kuroiwa, T. (1998). The primitive red algae Cyanidium caldarium and Cyanidioschyzonmerolae as model system for investigating the dividing apparatus of mitochondria and plastids. BioEssays 20, 344-354.
Larkum, A. W. D., Lockhart, P. J. & Howe, C. J. (2007). Shopping for plastids. Trends in Plant Science 12, 189-195.
Latasa, M., Scharek, R., Le Gall, F. & Guillou, L. (2004). Pigment suites and taxonomic groups in Prasinophyceae. Journal of Phycology 40, 1149-1155.
Le Gall, L. & Saunders, G. W. (2007). A nuclear phylogeny of the Florideophyceae (Rhodophyta) inferred from combined EF2, small subunit and large subunit ribosomal DNA: Establishing the new red algal subclass Corallinophycidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43, 1118-1130.
Leliaert, F., Smith, D. R., Moreau, H., Herron, M. D., Verbruggen, H., Delwiche, C. F. & De Clerck, O. (2012). Phylogeny and molecular evolution of the green algae. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 31, 1-46.
Leliaert, F., Verbruggen, H. & Zechman, F. W. (2011). Into the deep: New discoveries at the base of the green plant phylogeny. BioEssays 33, 683-692.
Lemieux, C., Otis, C. & Turmel, M. (2007). A clade uniting the green algae Mesostigma viride and Chlorokybus atmophyticus represents the deepest branch of the Streptophyta in chloroplast genome-based phylogenies. BMC Biology 5, 2.
Lepère, C., Vaulot, D. & Scanlan, D. J. (2009). Photosynthetic picoeukaryote community structure in the South East Pacific Ocean encompassing the most oligotrophic waters on Earth. Environmental Microbiology 11, 3105-3117.
Lewis, L. A. & Lewis, P. O. (2005). Unearthing the molecular phylodiversity of desert soil green algae (Chlorophyta). Systematic Biology 54, 936-947.
Lewis, L. A. & McCourt, R. M. (2004). Green algae and the origin of land plants. American Journal of Botany 91, 1535-1556.
Lewis, L. A. & Muller-Parker, G. (2004). Phylogenetic placement of “Zoochlorellae” (Chlorophyta), algal symbiont of the temperate sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Biological Bulletin 207, 87-92.
López-Bautista, J. M. & Chapman, R. L. (2003). Phylogenetic affinities of the Trentepohliales inferred from small-subunit rDNA. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 53, 2099-2106.
López-Bautista, J. M., Rindi, F. & Guiry, M. D. (2006). Molecular systematics of the subaerial green algal order Trentepohliales: an assessment based on morphological and molecular data. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 56, 1709-1715.
Maggs, C. A., Verbruggen, H. & De Clerck, O. (2007). Molecular systematics of red algae: building future structures on firm foundations. In “Unravelling the algae: the past, present, and future of algal systematics” (J. Brodie and J. Lewis, eds.), pp. 103-121. Taylor and Francis.
Marin, B. (2012). Nested in the Chlorellales or independent class? Phylogeny and classification of the Pedinophyceae (Viridiplantae) revealed by molecular phylogenetic analyses of complete nuclear and plastid-encoded rRNA operons. Protist.
Marin, B. & Melkonian, M. (2010). Molecular phylogeny and classification of the Mamiellophyceae class. nov. (Chlorophyta) based on sequence comparisons of the nuclear- and plastid-encoded rRNA operons. Protist 161, 304-336.
Marin, B., Nowack, E. C. M. & Melkonian, M. (2005). A plastid in the making: Evidence for a second primary endosymbiosis. Protist 156, 425-32.
Martin, W. & Muller, M. (1998). The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote. Nature 392, 37-41.
Martin, W., Rujan, T., Richly, E., Hansen, A., Cornelsen, S., Lins, T., Leister, D., Stoebe, B., Hasegawa, M. & Penny, D. (2002). Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 12246-12251.
Matsuzaki, M., Misumi, O., Shin-i, T., Maruyama, S., Takahara, M., Miyagishima, S.-y., Mori, T., Nishida, K., Yagisawa, F., Nishida, K., Yoshida, Y., Nishimura, Y., Nakao, S., Kobayashi, T., Momoyama, Y., Higashiyama, T., Minoda, A., Sano, M., Nomoto, H., Oishi, K., Hayashi, H., Ohta, F., Nishizaka, S., Haga, S., Miura, S., Morishita, T., Kabeya, Y., Terasawa, K., Suzuki, Y., Ishii, Y., Asakawa, S., Takano, H., Ohta, N., Kuroiwa, H., Tanaka, K., Shimizu, N., Sugano, S., Sato, N., Nozaki, H., Ogasawara, N., Kohara, Y. & Kuroiwa, T. (2004a). Genome sequence of the ultrasmall unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D. Nature 428, 653-657.
McCourt, R. M., Delwiche, C. F. & Karol, K. G. (2004). Charophyte algae and land plant origins. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19, 661-666.
Melkonian, M. (1990). Phylum Chlorophyta. Class Prasinophyceae. In “Handbook of Protoctista. The structure, cultivation, habitats and life histories of the eukaryotic microorganisms and their descendants exclusive of animals, plants and fungi” (L. Margulis, J. O. Corliss, M. Melkonian and D. J. Chapman, eds.), pp. 600-607. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston.
Merchant, S. S., Prochnik, S. E., Vallon, O., Harris, E. H., Karpowicz, S. J., Witman, G. B., Terry, A., Salamov, A., Fritz-Laylin, L. K., Marechal-Drouard, L., Marshall, W. F., Qu, L. H., Nelson, D. R., Sanderfoot, A. A., Spalding, M. H., Kapitonov, V. V., Ren, Q. H., Ferris, P., Lindquist, E., Shapiro, H., Lucas, S. M., Grimwood, J., Schmutz, J., Cardol, P., Cerutti, H., Chanfreau, G., Chen, C. L., Cognat, V., Croft, M. T., Dent, R., Dutcher, S., Fernandez, E., Fukuzawa, H., Gonzalez-Balle, D., Gonzalez-Halphen, D., Hallmann, A., Hanikenne, M., Hippler, M., Inwood, W., Jabbari, K., Kalanon, M., Kuras, R., Lefebvre, P. A., Lemaire, S. D., Lobanov, A. V., Lohr, M., Manuell, A., Meir, I., Mets, L., Mittag, M., Mittelmeier, T., Moroney, J. V., Moseley, J., Napoli, C., Nedelcu, A. M., Niyogi, K., Novoselov, S. V., Paulsen, I. T., Pazour, G., Purton, S., Ral, J. P., Riano-Pachon, D. M., Riekhof, W., Rymarquis, L., Schroda, M., Stern, D., Umen, J., Willows, R., Wilson, N., Zimmer, S. L., Allmer, J., Balk, J., Bisova, K., Chen, C. J., Elias, M., Gendler, K., Hauser, C., Lamb, M. R., Ledford, H., Long, J. C., Minagawa, J., Page, M. D., Pan, J. M., Pootakham, W., Roje, S., Rose, A., Stahlberg, E., Terauchi, A. M., Yang, P. F., Ball, S., Bowler, C., Dieckmann, C. L., Gladyshev, V. N., Green, P., Jorgensen, R., Mayfield, S., Mueller-Roeber, B., Rajamani, S., Sayre, R. T., Brokstein, P., et al. (2007). The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science 318, 245-251.
Misumi, O., Matsuzaki, M., Nozaki, H., Miyagishima, S., Mori, T., Nishida, K., Yagisawa, F., Yoshida, Y., Kuroiwa, H. & Kuroiwa, T. (2005). Cyanidioschyzon merolae genome. A tool for facilitating comparable studies on organelle biogenesis in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Plant Physiology 137, 567-585.
Moestrup, Ø., Inouye, I. & Hori, T. (2003). Ultrastructural studies on Cymbomonas tetramitiformis (Prasinophyceae). I. General structure, scale microstructure, and ontogeny. Canadian Journal of Botany 81, 657-671.
Moreira, D., Le Guyader, H. & Philippe, H. (2000). The origin of red algae and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature 405, 69-72.
Moustafa, A. & Bhattacharya, D. (2008). PhyloSort: a user-friendly phylogenetic sorting tool and its application to estimating the cyanobacterial contribution to the nuclear genome of Chlamydomonas. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8.
Müller, K. M., Lynch, M. D. J. & Sheath, R. G. (2010). Bangiophytes: From one Class to Six; Where Do We Go from Here? In “Red Algae in the Genomic Age”, vol. 13. Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology (J. Seckbach and D. J. Chapman, eds.), pp. 241-259. Springer Netherlands.
Müller, K. M., Oliveira, M. C., Sheath, R. G. & Bhattacharya, D. (2001). Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the Bangiophycidae (Rhodophyta) and the origin of secondary plastids. American Journal of Botany 88, 1390-1400.
Nakayama, T., Kawachi, M. & Inouye, I. (2000). Taxonomy and the phylogenetic position of a new prasinophycean alga, Crustomastix didyma gen. & sp. nov. (Chlorophyta). Phycologia 39, 337-348.
Nakayama, T., Marin, B., Kranz, H. D., Surek, B., Huss, V. A. R., Inouye, I. & Melkonian, M. (1998). The basal position of scaly green flagellates among the green algae (Chlorophyta) is revealed by analyses of nuclear-encoded SSU rRNA sequences. Protist 149, 367-380.
Nakayama, T., Suda, S., Kawachi, M. & Inouye, I. (2007). Phylogeny and ultrastructure of Nephroselmis and Pseudoscourfieldia (Chlorophyta), including the description of Nephroselmisanterostigmatica sp. nov. and a proposal for the Nephroselmidales ord. nov. Phycologia 46, 680-697.
Nikaido, I., Asamizu, E., Nakajima, M., Nakamura, Y., Saga, N. & Tabata, S. (2000). Generation of 10,154 expressed sequence tags from a leafy gametophyte of a marine red alga, Porphyra yezoensis. DNA Research 7, 223-227.
Niwa, K., Iida, S., Kato, A., Kawai, H., Kikuchi, N., Kobiyama, A. & Aruga, Y. (2009). Genetic diversity and introgression in two cultivated species (Porphyra yezoensis and Porphyra tenera) and closely related wild species of Porphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). Journal of Phycology 45, 493-502.
Not, F., Latasa, M., Marie, D., Cariou, T., Vaulot, D. & Simon, N. (2004). A single species, Micromonas pusilla (Prasinophyceae), dominates the eukaryotic picoplankton in the western English channel. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70, 4064-4072.
Nowack, E. C. M. & Grossman, A. R. (2012). Trafficking of protein into the recently established photosynthetic organelles of Paulinella chromatophora. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 5340-5345.
Nowack, E. C. M., Vogel, H., Groth, M., Grossman, A. R., Melkonian, M. & Glockner, G. (2011). Endosymbiotic gene transfer and transcriptional regulation of transferred genes in Paulinella chromatophora. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28, 407-422.
Nozaki, H., Maruyama, S., Matsuzaki, M., Nakada, T., Kato, S. & Misawa, K. (2009). Phylogenetic positions of Glaucophyta, green plants (Archaeplastida) and Haptophyta (Chromalveolata) as deduced from slowly evolving nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53, 872-880.
O’Kelly, C. J. (2007). The origin and early evolution of green plants. In “Evolution of primary producers in the sea” (P. G. Falkowski and A. H. Knoll, eds.), pp. 287-309. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
O’Kelly, C. J., Sieracki, M. E., Thier, E. C. & Hobson, I. C. (2003). A transient bloom of Ostreococcus (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae) in West Neck Bay, Long Island, New York. Journal of Phycology 39, 850-854.
Oliveira, M. C. & Bhattacharya, D. (2000). Phylogeny of the Bangiophycidae (Rhodophyta) and the secondary endosymbiotic origin of algal plastids. American Journal of Botany 87, 482-492.
Palenik, B., Grimwood, J., Aerts, A., Rouze, P., Salamov, A., Putnam, N., Dupont, C., Jorgensen, R., Derelle, E., Rombauts, S., Zhou, K. M., Otillar, R., Merchant, S. S., Podell, S., Gaasterland, T., Napoli, C., Gendler, K., Manuell, A., Tai, V., Vallon, O., Piganeau, G., Jancek, S., Heijde, M., Jabbari, K., Bowler, C., Lohr, M., Robbens, S., Werner, G., Dubchak, I., Pazour, G. J., Ren, Q. H., Paulsen, I., Delwiche, C., Schmutz, J., Rokhsar, D., Van de Peer, Y., Moreau, H. & Grigoriev, I. V. (2007). The tiny eukaryote Ostreococcus provides genomic insights into the paradox of plankton speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 7705-7710.
Parfrey, L. W., Grant, J., Tekle, Y. I., Lasek-Nesselquist, E., Morrison, H. G., Sogin, M. L., Patterson, D. J. & Katz, L. A. (2010). Broadly sampled multigene analyses yield a well-resolved eukaryotic tree of life. Systematic Biology 59, 518-533.
Parfrey, L. W., Lahr, D. J. G., Knoll, A. H. & Katz, L. A. (2011). Estimating the timing of early eukaryotic diversification with multigene molecular clocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 13624-13629.
Patron, N. J., Inagaki, Y. & Keeling, P. J. (2007). Multiple gene phylogenies support the monophyly of cryptomonad and haptophyte host lineages. Current Biology 17, 887-891.
Poole, A. M. & Neumann, N. (2011). Reconciling an archaeal origin of eukaryotes with engulfment: a biologically plausible update of the Eocyte hypothesis. Research in Microbiology 162, 71-76.
Price, D. C., Chan, C. X., Yoon, H. S., Yang, E. C., Qiu, H., Weber, A. P., Schwacke, R., Gross, J., Blouin, N. A., Lane, C., Reyes-Prieto, A., Durnford, D. G., Neilson, J. A., Lang, F. B., Gertraud Burger, G., Steiner, J. M., Löffelhardt, W., Meuser, J. E., Posewitz, M. C., Ball, S., Arias, M. C., Henrissat, B., Coutinho, P. M., Rensing, S. A., Symeonidi, A., Doddapaneni, H., Green, B. R., Rajah, V. D., Boore, J. & Bhattacharya, D. (2012). Cyanophora paradoxa genome elucidates origin of photosynthesis in algae and plants. Science 335, 843-847.
Prochnik, S. E., Umen, J., Nedelcu, A. M., Hallmann, A., Miller, S. M., Nishii, I., Ferris, P., Kuo, A., Mitros, T., Fritz-Laylin, L. K., Hellsten, U., Chapman, J., Simakov, O., Rensing, S. A., Terry, A., Pangilinan, J., Kapitonov, V., Jurka, J., Salamov, A., Shapiro, H., Schmutz, J., Grimwood, J., Lindquist, E., Lucas, S., Grigoriev, I. V., Schmitt, R., Kirk, D. & Rokhsar, D. S. (2010). Genomic analysis of organismal complexity in the multicellular green alga Volvox carteri. Science 329, 223-226.
Raymond, J. & Segré, D. (2006). The effect of oxygen on biochemical networks and the evolution of complex life. Science 311, 1764-1767.
Reyes-Prieto, A. & Bhattacharya, D. (2007). Phylogeny of nuclear-encoded plastid-targeted proteins supports an early divergence of glaucophytes within plantae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 2358-2361.
Reyes-Prieto, A., Hackett, J. D., Soares, M. B., Bonaldo, M. F. & Bhattacharya, D. (2006). Cyanobacterial contribution to algal nuclear genomes a primarily limited to plastid functions. Current Biology 16, 2320-2325.
Reyes-Prieto, A., Yoon, H. S., Moustafa, A., Yang, E. C., Andersen, R. A., Boo, S. M., Nakayama, T., Ishida, K. & Bhattacharya, D. (2010). Differential Gene Retention in Plastids of Common Recent Origin. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27, 1530-1537.
Rindi, F. (2011). Terrestrial green algae: systematics, biogeography and expected responses to climate change. In “Climate Change, Ecology and Systematics” (T. Hodkinson, S. Jones, S. Waldren and J. Parnell, eds.), pp. 201-227. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, N., Brinkmann, H., Burey, S. C., Roure, B., Burger, G., Loffelhardt, W., Bohnert, H. J., Philippe, H. & Lang, B. F. (2005). Monophyly of primary photosynthetic eukaryotes: Green plants, red algae, and glaucophytes. Current Biology 15, 1325-1330.
Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, N., Philippe, H., Brinkmann, H., Becker, B. & Melkonian, M. (2007). Phylogenetic analyses of nuclear, mitochondrial, and plastid multigene data sets support the placement of Mesostigma in the Streptophyta. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 723-731.
Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, N., Philippe, H., Brinkmann, H., Becker, B. & Melkonian, M. (2007). Phylogenetic analyses of nuclear, mitochondrial, and plastid multigene data sets support the placement of Mesostigma in the Streptophyta. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 723-731.
Roger, A. J. (1999). Reconstructing early events in eukaryotic evolution. American Naturalist 154, S146-S163.
Roger, A. J. & Hug, L. A. (2006). The origin and diversification of eukaryotes: problems with molecular phylogenetics and molecular clock estimation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 361, 1039-1054.
Russell, M. J. & Hall, A. J. (2006). The onset and early evolution of life. In Evolution of early earth’s atmosphere, hydrosphere and biosphere – Constraints from ore depositis (ed. S. E. Kesler and H. Ohmoto), pp. 1-32. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.
Sato, N., Wise, R. R. & Hoober, J. K. (2006). Origin and evolution of plastids: genomic view on the unification and diversity of plastids. The Structure and Function of Plastids, vol. 23. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, pp. 75-102. Springer Netherlands.
Saunders, G. W., Chiovitti, A. & Kraft, G. T. (2004). Small-subunit rDNA sequences from representatives of selected families of the Gigartinales and Rhodymeniales (Rhodophyta). 3. Delineating the Gigartinales sensu stricto. Canadian Journal of Botany 82, 43-74.
Saunders, G. W. & Hommersand, M. H. (2004). Assessing Red algal supraordinal diversity and taxonomy in the context of contemporary systematic data. American Journal of Botany 91, 1494-1507.
Schenk, H. E. A. (2001). Glaucocystophytes. In eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Scott, J., Yokoyama, A., Billard, C., Fresnel, J., Haras, Y., West, K. A. & West, J. A. (2008). Neorhodella cyanea, a new genus in the Rhodellophyceae (Rhodophyta). Phycologia 47, 560-572.
Shi, X. L., Marie, D., Jardillier, L., Scanlan, D. J. & Vaulot, D. (2009). Groups without cultured representatives dominate eukaryotic picophytoplankton in the oligotrophic South East Pacific Ocean. PLoS One 4, e7657.
Sieburth, J. M., Keller, M. D., Johnson, P. W. & Myklestad, S. M. (1999). Widespread occurrence of the oceanic ultraplankter, Prasinococcus capsulatus (Prasinophyceae), the diagnostic “Golgi-decapore complex” and the newly described polysaccharide “capsulan”. Journal of Phycology 35, 1032-1043.
Simon, N., Cras, A. L., Foulon, E. & Lemee, R. (2009). Diversity and evolution of marine phytoplankton. Comptes Rendus Biologies 332, 159-170.
Steiner, J. M. & Löffelhardt, W. (2002). Protein import into cyanelles. Trends in Plant Science 7, 72-77.
Steiner, J. M., Yusa, F., Pompe, J. A. & Loffelhardt, W. (2005). Homologous protein import machineries in chloroplasts and cyanelles. Plant Journal 44, 646-652.
Stirewalt, V., Michalowski, C., Löffelhardt, W., Bohnert, H. & Bryant, D. (1995). Nucleotide sequence of the cyanelle genome from Cyanophora paradoxa. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 13, 327-332.
Suda, S., Watanabe, M. M. & Inouye, I. (2004). Electron microscopy of sexual reproduction in Nephroselmis olivacea (Prasinophyceae, Chlorophyta). Phycological Research 52, 273-283.
Sudman, M. S. (1974). Protothecosis: Critical review. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 61, 10-19.
Sutherland, J. E., Lindstrom, S. C., Nelson, W. A., Brodie, J., Lynch, M. D. J., Hwang, M. S., Choi, H. G., Miyata, M., Kikuchi, N., Oliveira, M. C., Farr, T., Neefus, C., Mols-Mortensen, A., Milstein, D. & Muller, K. M. (2011). A new look at an ancient order: generic revision of the Bangiales (Rhodophyta). Journal of Phycology 47, 1131-1151.
Sym, S. D. & Pienaar, R. N. (1993). The class Prasinophyceae. In “Progress in phycological research” (F. E. Round and D. J. Chapman, eds.), pp. 281-376. Biopress Ltd., Bristol.
Tappan, H. (1980). Palaeobiology of Plant Protists. Freeman, San Francisco.
Timme, R. E., Bachvaroff, T. R. & Delwiche, C. F. (2012). Broad phylogenomic sampling and the sister lineage of land plants. PLoS One 7, e29696.
Tirichine, L. & Bowler, C. (2011). Decoding algal genomes: tracing back the history of photosynthetic life on Earth. The Plant Journal 66, 45-57.
Tomitani, A., Knoll, A. H., Cavanaugh, C. M. & Ohno, T. (2006). The evolutionary diversification of cyanobacteria: Molecular-phylogenetic and paleontological perspectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 5442-5447.
Toulza, E., Blanc-Mathieu, R., Gourbiere, S., & Piganeau, G. (2012). Environmental genomics ofmicrobial algae: Power and challenges ofmetagenomics.Advances in Botanical Research, 64, 379-423.
Turmel, M., Gagnon, M.-C., O’Kelly, C. J., Otis, C. & Lemieux, C. (2009). The chloroplast genomes of the green algae Pyramimonas, Monomastix, and Pycnococcus shed new light on the evolutionary history of prasinophytes and the origin of the secondary chloroplasts of euglenids. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26, 631-648.
Turmel, M., Otis, C. & Lemieux, C. (2006). The chloroplast genome sequence of Chara vulgaris sheds new light into the closest green algal relatives of land plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, 1324-1338.
Turmel, M., Otis, C. & Lemieux, C. (2007). An unexpectedly large and loosely packed mitochondrial genome in the charophycean green alga Chlorokybus atmophyticus. BMC Genomics 8, 137.
Umen, J., & Olson, B. (2012). Genomics of Volvocine Algae. Advances in Botanical Research, 64, 185–243.
Van Bel, M., Proost, S., Wischnitzki, E., Movahedi, S., Scheerlinck, C., Van de Peer, Y. & Vandepoele, K. (2012). Dissecting Plant Genomes with the PLAZA Comparative Genomics Platform. Plant Physiology 158, 590-600.
van den Hoek, C., Mann, D. G. & Jahns, H. M. (1995). Algae: an introduction to phycology. Cambridge University Press.
Vaulot, D., Eikrem, W., Viprey, M. & Moreau, H. (2008). The diversity of small eukaryotic phytoplankton (≤ 3 µm) in marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 32, 795-820.
Verbruggen, H., Maggs, C., Saunders, G., Le Gall, L., Yoon, H. S. & De Clerck, O. (2010). Data mining approach identifies research priorities and data requirements for resolving the red algal tree of life. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10, 16.
Viprey, M., Guillou, L., Ferréol, M. & Vaulot, D. (2008). Wide genetic diversity of picoplanktonic green algae (Chloroplastida) in the Mediterranean Sea uncovered by a phylum-biased PCR approach. Environmental Microbiology 10, 1804-1822.
Wada, M., Kagawa, T. & Sato, Y. (2003). Chloroplast movement. Annual Review of Plant Biology 54, 455-468.
West, J. A., Zuccarello, G. C., Scott, J. L., Westi, K. A. & Karsten, U. (2007). Rhodaphanes brevistipitata gen. et sp nov., a new member of the Stylonematophyceae (Rhodophyta). Phycologia 46, 440-449.
Williams, S. L. & Smith, J. E. (2007). A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 38, 327-359.
Wodniok, S., Brinkmann, H., Glockner, G., Heidel, A., Philippe, H., Melkonian, M. & Becker, B. (2011). Origin of land plants: Do conjugating green algae hold the key? BMC Evolutionary Biology 11, 104.
The glaucophytes, also known as glaucocystophytes or glaucocystids, are a small group of rare freshwater microscopic algae. Together with the red algae (Rhodophyta) and the green algae plus land plants (Viridiplantae or Chloroplastida), they form the Archaeplastida. However, the relationships among the red algae, green algae and glaucophytes are unclear, in large part due to limited study of the glaucophytes.
The glaucophytes are of interest to biologists studying the development of chloroplasts because some studies suggest they may be similar to the original algal type that led to green plants and red algae in that they may be basal Archaeplastida.
The chloroplasts of glaucophytes are known as 'cyanelles' or 'cyanoplasts'. Unlike the chloroplasts in other organisms, they have a peptidoglycan layer, believed to be a relic of the endosymbiotic origin of plastids from cyanobacteria. Glaucophytes contain the photosynthetic pigment chlorophyll a. Along with red algae and cyanobacteria, they harvest light via phycobilisomes, structures consisting largely of phycobiliproteins. The green algae and land plants have lost that pigment. Like red algae, and in contrast to green algae and plants, glaucophytes store fixed carbon in the cytosol.
Glaucophytes have mitochondria with flat cristae, and undergo open mitosis without centrioles. Motile forms have two unequal flagella, which may have fine hairs and are anchored by a multilayered system of microtubules, both of which are similar to forms found in some green algae.
Only 13 species of glaucophytes are known, none of which is particularly common in nature. The four included genera are:
- Glaucocystis is immotile, though it retains very short vestigial flagella, and has a cellulose wall.
- Cyanophora is motile and lacks a cell wall.
- Gloeochaete has both motile and immotile stages, and its cell wall does not appear to be composed of cellulose.
- Cyanoptyche is the least studied of the four genera
The glaucophytes were considered before as part of family Oocystaceae, in the order Chlorococcales.
- Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. (2008). "Glaucophyta". AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway.
- ^ abcdefPatrick J. Keeling (2004). "Diversity and evolutionary history of plastids and their hosts". American Journal of Botany. 91 (10): 1481–1493. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1481. PMID 21652304.
- ^Jeffrey D. Palmer, Douglas E. Soltis & Mark W. Chase (2004). "The plant tree of life: an overview and some points of view". American Journal of Botany. 91 (10): 1437–1445. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1437. PMID 21652302.
- ^Eunsoo Kim & Linda E. Graham (2008). Redfield, Rosemary Jeanne, ed. "EEF2 Analysis Challenges the Monophyly of Archaeplastida and Chromalveolata"(Free full text). PLoS ONE. 3 (7): e2621. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002621. PMC 2440802. PMID 18612431.
- ^ abSkuja, A. (1948). Taxonomie des Phytoplanktons einiger Seen in Uppland, Schweden. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 9(3): 1-399.Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. (2008). "Glaucophyta". AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway.
- ^Ball, S.; Colleoni, C.; Cenci, U.; Raj, J. N.; Tirtiaux, C. (10 January 2011). "The evolution of glycogen and starch metabolism in eukaryotes gives molecular clues to understand the establishment of plastid endosymbiosis". Journal of Experimental Botany. 62 (6): 1775–1801. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq411. PMID 21220783.