Security cameras have become common in many countries and the expanding use of surveillance cameras in today’s society has lead to more privacy issues being raised. Currently, surveillance cameras are accustomed not only by the authority but also by individuals and other private or secret firms. The use of cctv devices have become so usually used that it has affected our typical way of living. Considering before they appeared only in banks and at high-secutiry areas, they are now accessing public places such as malls, streets and transport. And the public surveillance cameras being an invasion of privacy and it has been growing for the past few years. Many people contend that the steady video surveillance is an invasion of their privacy. To maintain the privacy and freedom of the people, the security cameras should not be allowed.
Security cameras may pose a threat to personal privacy through the recording of video. Firstly, some security camera systems are virtuously intended for live monitoring, the enormous majorities grasp advantage of the ability to record and store videos on a companion device. Secondly, when a series of cameras sends a video to a set of monitors watched by a person or group, those being caught by the cameras may feel that their privacy is being trespassed. And why should they be able to videotape us? The people need to be respected, we have a voice and we need to use it. We are people and not dummies. We don’t deserve to be watched while living our lives. Lastly, in many places, such a busy mall or a parking lot, being watched via security camera monitors may not seem specifically invasive. When security cameras are placed in more close areas, although, such as dressing rooms or restaurants, those caught on tape may feel as though their, every step is being watched, possibly making them feel uncomfortable. Whereas personnel charged with watching live security camera videos are typically professionals with considerable experience in handling such devices and data, those delicate about their privacy and freedom may nevertheless hate being watched while going about their daily lives.
Officers and workers being dependent on surveillance cameras. Instead of watching and monitoring, they are more likely dependent on surveillance cameras. They’re not doing their jobs correctly. Officers were not doing what they should be doing when they’re arresting people, solving crimes and speaking to people.
There is no question that live monitoring and recording of videos through installing surveillance cameras give individuals a sense of security as these surveillance cameras will supply a deterrent against crime. Security cameras help stop crime; that is not an opinion, it is a fact. And surveillance cameras have many benefits. A distinct benefit is that the police can catch criminals in the act, thus decreasing crime. This will make the streets safer for people. A more important point is that criminals, specifically young offenders or petty criminals will be deterred. They will not be provoked to carry out crimes, and hence society will be a lot safer. However, CCTV systems, as stated, will not stop crime. In some places with many cameras the crime rate is higher than in other places. If a person is going to execute crime they will surely do it in a camera’s blind spot. A person who is crazy enough to perform a crime is going to do everything to make sure they will not be seen out. CCTV cameras are just there to give the public a false feeling of safety and are a less potent cover for policing.
Yes, through surveillance cameras it is more easier for the officers to identify the crimes and accidents in that particular area and they don’t need to hire guards just to monitor. Unfortunately, the use of security cameras has replaced many individuals’ jobs. Rather of hiring a guard to keep observe over a business, or an officer to watch a busy intersection or jammed area, it is easier and cheaper for companies to install a surveillance camera, rather than hire a person to do the job. This growth of security cameras has directly affected employment.
In conclusion, despite the fact that there are unquestionable benefits on using surveillance devices such as cameras, we must stop the need for security cameras with respect for the individual’s privacy and freedom. We also need to develop clearer rules about when and where surveillance cameras should be used, which are now absent. It makes sense to have cameras in places where crime are of particular concern such as in near major bridges and tunnels. It would be more bothering to learn, although, that the authority has centered cameras on the front doors of our houses just to keep track of our comings and goings.
Surveillance is defined as the close monitoring of the actions of a specific individual. The surveillance technology systems are devices that identify monitors and track the movements and data. Surveillance has raised a lot of concerns in privacy issues in the advancing technology. The electronic devices used include the closed circuit TV, the VCR, the telephone bugging, electronic databases and the proximity cards. Surveillance has presented numerous challenges to the right to privacy.
Every individual is entitled to the right to privacy and measures should be taken to address these issues in the new technology. An advanced technology can be very useful is properly handled but it can also presents with a lot of damage risks if misused. On the other hand, privacy can be described as the ability of not exposing an individual in any way to others without his consent. In my view, there are solution ideas to the problems that exist in surveillance and privacy. The solutions ideas are discussed in the essay below.
There is a need to develop a high technology surveillance system that will come with great benefits without intrusion. The development of the rapid DNA-based tests can serve a great significance in the protection from the biological weapons and the also in disease diagnosis. The tests will help us to reveal more about the health professionals. The high technology system will help to protect an individual privacy. The importance in the solution will require the government to amend laws to regulate the privacy associated with one’s privacy.
The government can also use the keystroke loggers as a spyware. The loggers are types of computer programs that can be used to track any records on a computer. The software program can be used to track production in workplaces, but they role in computers ensures that they are used as a spyware. They ensure privacy is protected if used as a tool in surveillance by the government. The federal law will require amendments in protecting the keystroke loggers’ installation.
The development of location technologies also is a solution to surveillance and privacy. There are electronic tracking devices which are used but advanced ones have been introduced in cell phones and in cars navigation systems. The technologies will ensure that individuals are safe, secure and convenient. The government has a responsibility to monitor one’s movement and ensure maximum security. There will be a need for legal standards which will aim at protecting the privacy rights in the surveillance of an individual.
The following is a criterion that can be used to evaluate the development of location technologies in surveillance. The government agencies must be authorized to take part in tracking the movements of individual. They must be aware that their privacy will not be exposed to other people by the agents. The fundamental human right is an issue to be well taken off. The tracking of movements in bad places does not mean the agents will have a right to expose this to the public. The development of the location technologies have been subsidized in cell phones and in the car systems and their costs is affordable.
This will help the United States government to develop it as it will not bear much economic weight. In a nutshell, there is a need to constitute laws and regulations responsible to govern an individual privacy in surveillance. No one has a right to carelessly expose somebody information without been given that consent.